Little Dragon
Tropican scholar
    
Posts: 463
Joined: Feb 2010
|
shanty must be smaller than bunkhouse in T4
|
|
| 10-05-2011 02:19 AM |
|
Profound
Newbie

Posts: 6
Joined: Feb 2012
|
RE: shanty must be smaller than bunkhouse in T4
(25-02-2012 07:30 PM)Tropije Wrote: They are much more usefull now, especially with the larger islands of T4, space is no longer such an issue. In T3 you could litterly fill every nook and crany and then some. T4, i have yet to even come close on many of the islands.
I love setting up little shanty towns down by the docks, or farms. Or even far off low end tourist areas. It is also a great way to get all the homeless in a place they can live semi comfortably.
Set up shanty, clinic, market and some free entertainment though your options on that are very limited.
it is a great way to not worry about shacks on your island from unemployed.
In my own experience, I've found that you don't loose that much income by just putting up a bunch of free tenements, even if some people choose to live in them over paying for apartments.
On the other hand, it seems after 10 years I'm always raking in millions no matter what.
|
|
| 26-02-2012 02:23 AM |
|
Little Dragon
Tropican scholar
    
Posts: 463
Joined: Feb 2010
|
RE: shanty must be smaller than bunkhouse in T4
(26-02-2012 07:09 PM)Tropije Wrote: for the most part you can't but you can use that big tall fire momument, that doesnt cost any money to use and provides some entertainment. There might be something else too that i am missing.
I do wish they would change all entertainment buildings to allow zero entry like T1.. I always liked having a free pub 
Omg, it sounds strange to manage free entertainment like that
Btw, as informed, people might enjoy sea-viewing alongside the beaches in T4. Is it correct? How funny would they feel ? i mean the entertainment index.
Free pubs/other entertainment buldings: I'm wondering why the devs didn't keep free fee as it was in T1? As the min.fee is at 1 peso, the retired and students would only get it, while it's a stop for the unemployed. There's an edict "fre house for everyone", why not a "free beer evryone" ?
But, I sometimes saw the unemployed entered pubs, did u see it ?, i.e they were still keeping some pennies after being laid off. But, if it's so, why couldn't they pay for rent charge for some months but lived in shacks?
(This post was last modified: 26-02-2012 11:23 PM by Little Dragon.)
|
|
| 26-02-2012 10:54 PM |
|
Sovereign
Member
  
Posts: 61
Joined: May 2010
|
RE: shanty must be smaller than bunkhouse in T4
(26-02-2012 10:54 PM)Little Dragon Wrote: (26-02-2012 07:09 PM)Tropije Wrote: for the most part you can't but you can use that big tall fire momument, that doesnt cost any money to use and provides some entertainment. There might be something else too that i am missing.
I do wish they would change all entertainment buildings to allow zero entry like T1.. I always liked having a free pub 
Omg, it sounds strange to manage free entertainment like that 
Btw, as informed, people might enjoy sea-viewing alongside the beaches in T4. Is it correct? How funny would they feel ? i mean the entertainment index.
Free pubs/other entertainment buldings: I'm wondering why the devs didn't keep free fee as it was in T1? As the min.fee is at 1 peso, the retired and students would only get it, while it's a stop for the unemployed. There's an edict "fre house for everyone", why not a "free beer evryone" ?
But, I sometimes saw the unemployed entered pubs, did u see it ?, i.e they were still keeping some pennies after being laid off. But, if it's so, why couldn't they pay for rent charge for some months but lived in shacks?
In soviet tropico the unemployed would recieve a check anyhow - its not their fault the government aint providing enough jobs
There could be another edict like the social security but for unemployed people.
Political views:
Enviromentalists (++)
Intellectuals (+)
Communists (+)
Militarists (+)
Capitalists (+)
Nationalists (-)
Loyalists (--)
Religious (---)
|
|
| 27-02-2012 12:37 AM |
|